Absolute Value Inequalities

Absolute value inequalities express ranges of values at a fixed distance from a point. Use them to solve distance, tolerance, or deviation problems.

x<a    a<x<a|x| < a \iff -a < x < a

Solve a problem with Absolute Value Inequalities

Type the problem. The solver will use Absolute Value Inequalities where Absolute Value Inequalities is the right tool, and tell you when it is not.

Drag one in or paste from the clipboard. JPEG, PNG or WebP. You get the transcription to check before anything is solved.

How to get a better answer
  • Paste the whole problem, including the instruction word — "simplify", "solve for x" and "factor" lead to three different answers.
  • Say what you have already tried. "I got x = 4 and the book says 2" turns a solution into a diagnosis.
  • Set the level in the settings button. A calculus shortcut is not a better answer if you have not met derivatives yet.
  • For a photo, get the whole problem in frame and hold the page flat — you get the transcription to fix before anything is solved.

What each symbol means

What Absolute Value Inequalities takes
aa
xx
Absolute Value Inequalities
SymbolMeaning
aaThe boundary value or threshold in the inequality, which must be positive; it represents the maximum distance from a reference point. If aa is negative or zero, the inequality may have no solution or only trivial solutions.
xxThe variable (or expression inside the absolute value) whose values you are solving for; it can be any real number, and the solution describes the complete set of values satisfying the inequality.

When to use it

When you need to find all values satisfying a condition about distance or magnitude, or when setting tolerance ranges in real-world contexts.

Level

Usually taught in: Algebra II

Worked examples

1. Solve a simple absolute value inequality with addition

Problem

Solve x+1<3|x + 1| < 3 for xx.
  1. x+1<3|x + 1| < 3

    This is our starting inequality. We need to find all values of xx where the absolute value of (x+1)(x + 1) is less than 3.

  2. 3<x+1<3-3 < x + 1 < 3

    Apply the absolute value inequality rule: if u<a|u| < a, then a<u<a-a < u < a. Here u=x+1u = x + 1 and a=3a = 3.

  3. 31<x<31-3 - 1 < x < 3 - 1

    Subtract 1 from all three parts of the compound inequality to isolate xx.

  4. 4<x<2-4 < x < 2

    Simplify each side to get the final solution: xx must be between 4-4 and 22.

Answer: 4<x<2-4 < x < 2

This problem demonstrates the core technique: apply the rule to convert an absolute value inequality into a compound inequality, then isolate the variable by using the same operations on all three parts. The result is an interval on the number line.

2. Solve an absolute value inequality with a negative coefficient

Problem

Solve 2x<3|2 - x| < 3 for xx.
  1. 2x<3|2 - x| < 3

    We need to find values of xx such that the absolute value of (2x)(2 - x) is less than 3.

  2. 3<2x<3-3 < 2 - x < 3

    Apply the rule: u<a    a<u<a|u| < a \iff -a < u < a, where u=2xu = 2 - x and a=3a = 3.

  3. 32<x<32-3 - 2 < -x < 3 - 2

    Subtract 2 from all parts to isolate the term containing xx.

  4. 5<x<1-5 < -x < 1

    Simplify: the left side is 32=5-3 - 2 = -5, and the right side is 32=13 - 2 = 1.

  5. 1<x<5-1 < x < 5

    Multiply all parts by 1-1 to solve for xx alone. Crucially, reverse all inequality signs when multiplying by a negative number: 5<x<1-5 < -x < 1 becomes 5>x>15 > x > -1, rewritten as 1<x<5-1 < x < 5.

Answer: 1<x<5-1 < x < 5

This example requires care because xx has a negative coefficient inside the absolute value. Students must remember to reverse inequality signs when multiplying or dividing by a negative number. This is a common mistake.

3. Solve a tolerance problem using absolute value inequality

Problem

A manufacturing plant produces nails that should be 2 inches long. Due to machinery limitations, the actual length can vary by up to 0.1 inches. Write and solve an absolute value inequality to find the range of acceptable nail lengths.
  1. L20.1|L - 2| \leq 0.1

    Let LL be the actual length in inches. The absolute value L2|L - 2| represents how far the actual length is from the target of 2 inches. The inequality states this difference must be at most 0.1 inches.

  2. 0.1L20.1-0.1 \leq L - 2 \leq 0.1

    Apply the absolute value rule to convert to a compound inequality.

  3. 0.1+2L0.1+2-0.1 + 2 \leq L \leq 0.1 + 2

    Add 2 to all parts to isolate LL.

  4. 1.9L2.11.9 \leq L \leq 2.1

    Simplify: 0.1+2=1.9-0.1 + 2 = 1.9 and 0.1+2=2.10.1 + 2 = 2.1.

Answer: 1.9L2.1 inches1.9 \leq L \leq 2.1 \text{ inches}

This word problem shows how absolute value inequalities model real-world tolerance ranges. Any nail with length between 1.9 and 2.1 inches is acceptable. This type of problem appears frequently in engineering and manufacturing contexts.

Common mistakes

Where Absolute Value Inequalities usually goes wrong
Answer came out wrong
Solving 2x1<5|2x - 1| < 5 as just 2x1<52x - 1 < 5, which gives x<3x < 3.
Use the complete rule: 5<2x1<5-5 < 2x - 1 < 5. Then solve: 4<2x<6-4 < 2x < 6, and dividing by 2 gives 2<x<3-2 < x < 3.
Writing the solution to x<5|x| < 5 as x>5x > -5 OR x<5x < 5 (listing two separate conditions with OR).
The correct solution is the compound inequality 5<x<5-5 < x < 5, which means xx must satisfy x>5x > -5 AND x<5x < 5 simultaneously.
When solving x+3<2|x + 3| < 2, writing 2<x+3<2-2 < x + 3 < 2 but then jumping directly to 2<x<2-2 < x < 2 without subtracting 3 from all parts.
After obtaining 2<x+3<2-2 < x + 3 < 2, subtract 3 from all three parts: 23<x<23-2 - 3 < x < 2 - 3, giving 5<x<1-5 < x < -1.
The mistakeWhy it is wrongThe fix
Solving 2x1<5|2x - 1| < 5 as just 2x1<52x - 1 < 5, which gives x<3x < 3.Applying only one half of the absolute value rule (the part about u<au < a) while ignoring the other half (that a<u-a < u). This shortcut misses the complete picture.Use the complete rule: 5<2x1<5-5 < 2x - 1 < 5. Then solve: 4<2x<6-4 < 2x < 6, and dividing by 2 gives 2<x<3-2 < x < 3.
Writing the solution to x<5|x| < 5 as x>5x > -5 OR x<5x < 5 (listing two separate conditions with OR).Forgetting that a compound inequality requires both conditions to hold at the same time. Using OR instead of AND creates a solution set that includes nearly the entire number line, which is incorrect.The correct solution is the compound inequality 5<x<5-5 < x < 5, which means xx must satisfy x>5x > -5 AND x<5x < 5 simultaneously.
When solving x+3<2|x + 3| < 2, writing 2<x+3<2-2 < x + 3 < 2 but then jumping directly to 2<x<2-2 < x < 2 without subtracting 3 from all parts.Skipping the algebraic step to isolate xx leads to an entirely wrong solution; the student fails to apply the same operation to all three parts of the compound inequality.After obtaining 2<x+3<2-2 < x + 3 < 2, subtract 3 from all three parts: 23<x<23-2 - 3 < x < 2 - 3, giving 5<x<1-5 < x < -1.

Tips and when to use something else

  • Always apply the complete rule: if u<a|u| < a, then a<u<a-a < u < a (not just u<au < a alone).
  • Substitute uu for complex expressions inside the absolute value first (e.g., let u=3x2u = 3x - 2), solve u<a|u| < a to get the compound inequality, then substitute back and solve for xx.
  • If aa is negative (e.g., x<3|x| < -3), recognize immediately that there is no solution, since absolute value is always non-negative. This differs from Linear Inequalities where solutions almost always exist.
  • If the inequality uses >> instead of << (e.g., x>a|x| > a), the solution structure is completely different: use OR instead of AND, giving x>ax > a OR x<ax < -a. Refer to Compound Inequalities for the correct method.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between x<a|x| < a and x>a|x| > a?
If x<a|x| < a, you get the compound inequality a<x<a-a < x < a (using AND, so xx is in one interval). If x>a|x| > a, you get x>ax > a OR x<ax < -a (using OR, so xx is in two separate regions). The AND versus OR distinction is critical: the first gives a bounded interval, and the second gives two unbounded rays.
Why does x<a|x| < a give a<x<a-a < x < a?
The absolute value x|x| represents the distance from xx to zero on a number line. If that distance is less than aa, then xx must be within aa units on either side of zero. Graphically, this is all points lying between a-a and aa.
Can an absolute value be less than zero?
No. Since x0|x| \geq 0 for all real xx, the inequality x<0|x| < 0 is impossible. There is no value of xx satisfying this condition, so the solution set is empty (no solution).
How do I solve ax+b<c|ax + b| < c?
First, apply the absolute value rule to get c<ax+b<c-c < ax + b < c. Then isolate xx by subtracting bb from all three parts and dividing by aa. Remember: if a<0a < 0, reverse all inequality signs when you divide by aa. The result is a compound inequality describing all solutions for xx.

Need a different method?

The full solver is not scoped to one formula — type any problem and it will pick the method.

Open the math solver

Reviewed 2026-09-18